Neumeier U., Lucas C.H. & Collins M. (2006) Erodibility
and erosion patterns of mudflat sediments investigated using an annular
flume. Aquatic Ecology, 40/4, 543-554.
doi:10.1007/s10452-004-0189-8
Abstract
Laboratory flume experiments were carried out, to measure the effect
of biota on erodibility of mudflat sediments. The experiments sought to
reproduce the environment of the lower mudflat at Hythe, Southampton Water,
Southern England; this is characterised by fine grain-size and a surface
layer of very fluid mud. Natural sediments were used to produce settled
beds in the Lab Carousel, an annular flume of 2 m diameter. The following
bed conditions were investigated: diatom biofilms; the addition of cockles
(Cerastoderma edule); and abiotic sediment, obtained by the addition
of sodium hypochlorite. The erosion threshold (tcrit, calculated with the
TKE method) was in the range 0.02-0.20 Pa. Bioconsolidation increased tcrit considerably: compared
to the abiotic sediment experiment, tcrit
was 5 to 10 time higher depending on the biofilm development. The relationship
between tcrit and water
content of sediment (the best proxy for sediment compaction) was as good,
or better than between tcrit
and chlorophyll a (proxy for biofilm development). When cockles
were introduced, tcrit
was significantly lower (reduction by 50% to 75% compared with the diatom
biofilm experiments), reflecting the surface disturbance by the bivalves.
The biofilm erosion was characterised by a patchy pattern: the bed surface
stayed mainly uneroded and erosion was visible only on a few elongated patches
commencing at some weakness points of the biofilm, then progressing downstream.
The results illustrate the importance of the surface heterogeneity: the irregularities
of a natural bed (weak points of the biofilm, bioturbations, microrelief,
larger roughness elements like shells or algae, etc.) have a determinant
effect on the erodibility of biofilms. Such characteristics may have more
influence than biofilm strength, because the erosion starts from the weaker
areas.
Back to the main page